Jean-François Monteil, ancien maître de conférences de linguistique générale à l’Université Michel de Montaigne de Bordeaux
Adresse électronique :
Jean-francois.monteil@neuf.fr
Les deux sites associés :
mindnewcontinent
https://mindnewcontinent.wordpress.com/
mindnewcontinentfrenchcornerLes sujets abordés et les articles publiés:KNOLmnc 0 Sites and topics – mindnewcontinentKNOLmnc Liste et classification des KNOLs mncX KNOLmnc 0 Diffusion |
KNOLmnc 0 Mind a Quarterly Review of Philosophy
Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes.
The three ingredients of strict implication: L (p ≡ Lq)
A la mémoire de René Madec de Quimper, grand nabab des Indes.
KNOLmnc 1 Modal logic. The three ingredients of strict implication
If one types on google: Mind a quarterly review of philosophy papers of mine appear in a flattering position. In a sense, they are published in the famous British journal.
x
x
x
Juin 2014
Le courriel de Jean-François Monteil adressé à Thomas Baldwin
On 19 Jun 2014, at 20:33, jean-francois.monteil@neuf.fr wrote:
Amicalement.
Jean-François Monteil
About the paradoxical sign of Jean-François Monteil and its importance for linguistics and logic
KNOLmnc 1 Modal logic. The three ingredients of strict implication. To Mind the British Journal of Philosophy.
Abstract
L (p ≡ Lq) is a formula of strict implication, to be read: It is certain that the possible fact p is equivalent to the certainty of the fact q. It represents the content of the complex sentences of natural language If p, then q and If and only if p, then q. L( p & Lq) w (~p & M~q), its developed form, is to be read It is one thing or the other, either p and then Lq, the conditional certainty of q, or not-p and then M~q, the possibility of not-q.The developed form indicates that the conjunction of p and not-q is impossible and that one has ~M (p & ~q). So is retrieved the content of the so called material implication. L( p & Lq) w (~p & M~q) implies the bilateral possible Mp & M~p and so disposes of the first paradox of material implication, the fact that a false proposition implies anything. (~p & M~q), the second alternative, disposes of the second paradox, the fact that a true proposition is implied by anything.
La réponse de Thomas Baldwin à Jean-François Monteil
Dear M. Monteil
If you were intending to submit your investigations in modal logic for publication in Mind, I am afraid that I should inform you that
the materials you have sent is not suitable for publication in Mind.
yours sincerely
Thomas Baldwin
(Editor, Mind)
x
x
x
mindnewcontinentfrenchcorner 
Laisser un commentaire